Try OpenCodeTry OpenCode

Compare AI models: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

  1. Qwen3.7 PlusAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Qwen3.7 Plus50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder52/10081/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Kimi K3.1 Pro50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder18/10092/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.40/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$1.60/ 1M
$10/ 1M
Cached input
$0.08/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
110K
70K
Completed sessions
1,175,339
183,446
Token share
0.05%
0.03%
Tokens
637B-58%
411B+100%
SEP 15NOV 9
SEP 15NOV 9
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
61.3%5.6K user-weeks
56.6%2.6K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.