Compare AI models: Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- Claude Opus 5.5AnthropicHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 100/100 | 75/100 | 8/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | 50/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 | 83/100 | 50/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text, Image, Video, Audio, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$4.00/ 1M
$0.75/ 1M
Output
$20/ 1M
$3.75/ 1M
Cached input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.07/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1
3
Completed sessions
2
19
Token share
0%
0%
Tokens
20M+100%
200K+100%
SEP 15NOV 9
SEP 15NOV 9
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeClaude Opus 5.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructClaude Opus 5.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGemini 3.8 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGemini 3.8 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonClaude Opus 5.5 vs Jamba MiniClaude Opus 5.5·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGemini 3.8 Flash vs Jamba MiniGemini 3.8 Flash·Jamba Mini