試用 OpenCode立即試用

Compare AI models: deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-op vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B

  1. deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-opDeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-op50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B0/10034/10089/10063/1000/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
Unknown
262K
Reasoning
Unknown
True
Input modalities
Unknown
Text
Output modalities
Unknown
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
Unknown
$0.03/ 1M
Output
Unknown
$0.12/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
41K
176K
Completed sessions
398,091
4,980,704
Token share
0.11%
0.31%
Tokens
1.5T+100%
4.2T+23%
SEP 15NOV 9
SEP 15NOV 9
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.