Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- MiniMax-M2.1MiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 73/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| MiniMax-M2.1 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 41/100 | 58/100 | 50/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
205K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.14/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$0.42/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.0042/ 1M
$0.03/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
5.7M
0
Completed sessions
157,691,420
14
Token share
50.8%
0%
Tokens
689T+2,607%
00%
SEP 15NOV 9
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
75.6%637K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMiniMax-M2.1 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M2.1·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiniMax-M2.1 vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M2.1·Jamba Mini