Wypróbuj OpenCodeWypróbuj

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash

  1. DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
  2. MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4 Pro100/100100/10042/10081/1000/10068/100
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder69/10081/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.04/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
Output
$2.09/ 1M
$0.60/ 1M
Cached input
$0.21/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
395K
969K
Completed sessions
1,586,416
125,777,973
Token share
0.41%
13.9%
Tokens
5.6T-78%
189T+100%
SEP 15NOV 9
SEP 15NOV 9
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
57.3%28K user-weeks
72.2%15K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.