试用 OpenCode立即试用

Compare AI models: deepseek-v4p1-flash-1017-spot vs Qwen3.7 Plus

  1. deepseek-v4p1-flash-1017-spotDeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Qwen3.7 PlusAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
deepseek-v4p1-flash-1017-spot50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder
Qwen3.7 Plus50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder52/10081/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
Unknown
1M
Reasoning
Unknown
True
Input modalities
Unknown
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Unknown
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
Unknown
$0.40/ 1M
Output
Unknown
$1.60/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.08/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
2.1K
110K
Completed sessions
15,041
1,175,872
Token share
0%
0.05%
Tokens
43B+100%
637B-58%
SEP 15NOV 9
SEP 15NOV 9
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
61.3%5.6K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.