OpenCode ausprobierenJetzt testen

Compare AI models: Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Hy4

  1. Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Hy4TencentHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Kimi K3.1 Pro50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder18/10092/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Hy450/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder41/10092/10033/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$0.83/ 1M
Output
$10/ 1M
$2.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
70K
12K
Completed sessions
183,968
45,313
Token share
0.03%
0.02%
Tokens
412B+100%
232B+100%
SEP 15NOV 9
SEP 15NOV 9
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
56.6%2.6K user-weeks
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.