OpenCode ausprobierenJetzt testen

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GPT-6 Luna

  1. DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
  2. GPT-6 LunaOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4 Pro100/100100/10042/10081/1000/10068/100
GPT-6 Luna50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark45/10072/10098/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1.1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.04/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
Output
$2.09/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.21/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
396K
1.3M
Completed sessions
1,587,878
9,935,062
Token share
0.41%
0.43%
Tokens
5.6T-78%
5.9T+100%
SEP 15NOV 9
SEP 15NOV 9
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
57.3%28K user-weeks
66.7%17K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.