Wypróbuj OpenCodeWypróbuj

Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5

  1. Qwen3.8 FlashAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Qwen3.8 Flash50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder70/10081/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Claude Haiku 5.569/10025/10071/10081/10050/10050/100
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
Output
$0.47/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.02/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
219K
208K
Completed sessions
2,683,034
2,012,953
Token share
0.19%
0.13%
Tokens
2.6T+107%
1.7T+100%
SEP 15NOV 9
SEP 15NOV 9
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
61.6%9.2K user-weeks
66.1%7.7K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.